My Photo

« ICWSM 2009 Getting Close | Main | Strings are not Meanings Part 2.1 »

April 11, 2009


Dave Steckler

Yep. "Short urls with analytics", is their ( tagline.

I also looked up "clig" on urbandictionary and, luckily for them (?), it is not defined yet.


How can we argue with conclusions like that. :)

Sam Johnston

Forget URL shorteners... letting sites set their own short links is a much better idea. My money's on rel="shortlink" because I haven't found any flaws yet - *all* of the earlier proposals (including my own) have varying degrees of deficiency.

Basically by specifying a short link (e.g. or in the HTML and/or HTTP headers, Twitter clients et al will be able to "resolve" a URL back to something short and sensible.


Cheap Computers

Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place, i will must refer this information with reference on my website i.e


I suspect cligs is a play on the word clicks. Would you know how long each url shortener has been around?


The readable here is a good one I also found the post

I would tend to agree with the authors making stable points.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    March 2016

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    


    Blog powered by Typepad