« Bing's Evolving Local Search | Main | Dear Web, Thanks For Using My Screen »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c994053ef017616a993ed970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dear Web, Please Use My Screen:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
Matt, I've been wondering about this for some time (since before the Ipad!). Yes, a lot of screen have a wide screen aspect ratio but what shape leads for the best reading? Can users handle a very wide block or do their eyes get tired? Does having text or widgets down the sides make people's eye's wander?
Cheers,
Andy
Posted by: Workshopshed | July 24, 2012 at 04:17 AM
When will technophiles realise that just because something is technically possible it does not mean it is sensible to do?
When will technophiles realise that quite some websites actually follow design principles, which tend to be sensible as well?
Good to ask a question. Better to do some actual thinking afterwards. Perhaps a search for readability + line length may help?
Posted by: Marc Machielse | July 24, 2012 at 05:28 AM
Most people I know with a widescreen at high resolutions rarely have their browser maximized. I, personally, use two 16:10 monitors that are rotated (90°) and I absolutely loathe websites that force a widescreen-design.
All that put aside, I agree with Marc, from a point of view were readability counts most, these sorts of designs are way friendlier on the eyes.
Posted by: Johannes Baiter | July 24, 2012 at 05:45 AM
@Marc Machielse - using more screen doesn't mean having longer lines spanning a wider column. Think of the evolution of television - widescreen was adopted there and, amazingly, textual information and other non video data has been adapted to that presentation format (think of news programmes). I'm a big fan of negative space (what designers call the empty spaces that form part of design), but I would also like to know what *opportunities* are seen in these wider screens. For example, I find all the advertising that clusters up the flow of reading to be horrible from a design perspective. It is, in fact, designed to make for poor reading. Why not explore how the additional horizontal space could be used instead?
Posted by: Matthew Hurst | July 24, 2012 at 08:38 PM
Ee don't all use widescreen monitors on the internet. Some of us have to use 1280x1024 or even 1024x768 screens for the web (even if we have larger/wide screens on other machines for development)
Posted by: Jamesfry | August 15, 2012 at 05:29 PM